Combination Of Inhibitors Research Articles

In vitro activity of cefiderocol in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from people with cystic fibrosis recovered during three multicentre studies in Spain.

Despite the introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is still a major pathogen in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). We determine the activity of cefiderocol and comparators in a collection of 154 P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from pwCF during three multicentre studies performed in 17 Spanish hospitals in 2013, 2017 and 2021. ISO broth microdilution was performed and MICs were interpreted with CLSI and EUCAST criteria. Mutation frequency and WGS were also performed. Overall, 21.4% were MDR, 20.8% XDR and 1.3% pandrug-resistant (PDR). Up to 17% of the isolates showed a hypermutator phenotype. Cefiderocol demonstrated excellent activity; only 13 isolates (8.4%) were cefiderocol resistant by EUCAST (none using CLSI). A high proportion of the isolates resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam (71.4%), meropenem/vaborbactam (70.0%), imipenem/relebactam (68.0%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (55.6%) were susceptible to cefiderocol. Nine out of 13 cefiderocol-resistant isolates were hypermutators (P < 0.001). Eighty-three STs were detected, with ST98 being the most frequent. Only one isolate belonging to the ST175 high-risk clone carried blaVIM-2. Exclusive mutations affecting genes involved in membrane permeability, AmpC overexpression (L320P-AmpC) and efflux pump up-regulation were found in cefiderocol-resistant isolates (MIC = 4-8 mg/L). Cefiderocol resistance could also be associated with mutations in genes related to iron uptake (tonB-dependent receptors and pyochelin/pyoverdine biosynthesis). Our results position cefiderocol as a therapeutic option in pwCF infected with P. aeruginosa resistant to most recent β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

The Menin story in acute myeloid leukaemia-The road to success.

The treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has changed fundamentally in the last decade with many new targeted therapies entering clinics. Some of the most interesting agents under development are Menin inhibitors which interfere with the interaction of Menin with wild-type (wt) KMT2A or a KMT2A-fusion protein and thereby downregulate the leukaemic gene expression (MEIS1, PBX3, HOX) in NPM1 mutant or KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia. Other HOX and MEIS1 expressing leukaemias may also be sensitive to Menin inhibition. Following the encouraging results as monotherapy in refractory and relapsed AML, the combination of Menin inhibitors with chemotherapeutic agents and other targeted drugs is being investigated clinically.

Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab and bevacizumab in appendiceal adenocarcinoma.

Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma (AA) remains an orphan disease with limited treatment options for patients unable to undergo surgical resection. Evidence supporting the efficacy of combined VEGF and PD-1 inhibition in other tumor types provided a compelling rationale for investigating this combination in AA, where immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have not been previously explored. We conducted a prospective, single arm phase 2 study evaluating efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in conjunction with bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) in advanced, unresectable AA. Patients treated with the Atezo+Bev combination had 100% disease control rate (1 PR, 15 SD) with progression free survival (PFS) of 18.3 months and overall survival not-yet-reached with median duration of follow up of 40 months. These survival intervals were significantly longer relative to a clinically and molecularly matched synthetic control cohort treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy designed for colorectal cancer (PFS of 4.4 months, p = .041). In light of recent data demonstrating a lack of efficacy of 5-FU based chemotherapy, Atezo+Bev is a promising treatment option for patients with low-grade unresectable AA; further study is warranted.

Real-World Impact of Upfront Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Immunotherapy Combinations or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (A Sub-Analysis from the ARON-1 Retrospective Study).

About 20% of patients with renal cell carcinoma present with non-clear cell histology (nccRCC), encompassing various histological types. While surgery remains pivotal for localized-stage nccRCC, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic nccRCC is contentious. Limited data exist on the role of CN in metastatic nccRCC under current standard of care. This retrospective study focused on the impact of upfront CN on metastatic nccRCC outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) combinations or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy. The study included 221 patients with nccRCC and synchronous metastatic disease, treated with IO combinations or TKI monotherapy in the first line. Baseline clinical characteristics, systemic therapy, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS)and overall survival(OS). Statistical analysis involved the Fisher exact test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Median OS for patients undergoing upfront CN was 36.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.9-71.3) versus 20.8 (95% CI 12.6-24.8) months for those without CN (p = 0.005). Upfront CN was significantly associated with OS in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 0.47 [95% CI 0.31-0.72], p < 0.001). In patients without CN, the median OS and PFS was 24.5 (95% CI 18.1-40.5) and 13.0 months (95% CI 6.6-23.5) for patients treated with IO+TKI versus 7.5 (95% CI 4.3-22.4) and 4.9 months (95% CI 3.0-8.1) for those receiving the IO+IO combination (p = 0.059 and p = 0.032, respectively). Our study demonstrates the survival benefits of upfront CN compared with systemic therapy without CN. The study suggests that the use of IO+TKI combination or, eventually, TKI monotherapy might be a better choice than IO+IO combination for patients who are not candidates for CN regardless of IO eligibility. Prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and refine the role of CN in current mRCC management.

KRAS G12C inhibitor combination therapies: current evidence and challenge

Although KRAS G12C inhibitors have proven that KRAS is a “druggable” target of cancer, KRAS G12C inhibitor monotherapies have demonstrated limited clinical efficacy due to primary and acquired resistance mechanisms. Multiple combinations of KRAS G12C inhibitors with other targeted therapies, such as RTK, SHP2, and MEK inhibitors, have been investigated in clinical trials to overcome the resistance. They have demonstrated promising efficacy especially by combining KRAS G12C and EGFR inhibitors for KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer. Many clinical trials of combinations of KRAS G12C inhibitors with other targeted therapies, such as SOS1, ERK, CDK4/6, and wild-type RAS, are ongoing. Furthermore, preclinical data have suggested additional promising KRAS G12C combinations with YAP/TAZ-TEAD inhibitors, FAK inhibitors, and farnesyltransferase inhibitors. The combinations of KRAS G12C inhibitors with immunotherapies and chemotherapies have also been investigated, and the preliminary results were reported. More recently, KRAS-targeted therapies not limited to KRAS G12C are being developed, potentially broadening the treatment landscape of KRAS-mutated cancers. Rationally combining KRAS inhibitors with other therapeutics is likely to play a significant role in future treatment for KRAS-mutated solid tumors.

Blocking the ATR-SerRS-VEGFA pathway targets angiogenesis for UV-induced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most prevalent form of skin cancer, with an escalating incidence rate and a notable potential (up to 5%) for metastasis. Ultraviolet radiation (UVA and UVB) exposure is the primary risk factor for cSCC carcinogenesis, with literature suggesting ultraviolet radiation (UVR) promotes vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA)expression. This study aims to investigate UVR-induced upregulation of VEGFA and explore combination therapeutic strategies. The skin squamous cell carcinoma cell line A431 was exposed to specific durations of ultraviolet radiation. The effect of emodin on ATR/SerRS/VEGFA pathway was observed. The cell masses were also transplanted subcutaneously into mice (n = 8). ATR inhibitor combined with emodin was used to observe the growth and angiogenesis of the xenografts. The results showed that UV treatment significantly enhanced the phosphorylation of SerRS and the expression level of VEGFA in A431 cells (p < 0.05). Treatment with emodin significantly inhibited this expression (p < 0.05), and the combination of emodin and ATR inhibitor further enhanced the inhibitory effect (p < 0.05). This phenomenon was further confirmed in the xenograft model, which showed that the combination of ATR inhibitor and emodin significantly inhibited the expression of VEGFA to inhibit angiogenesis (p < 0.05), thus showing an inhibitory effect on cSCC. This study innovatively reveals the molecular mechanism of UV-induced angiogenesis in cSCC and confirms SerRS as a novel target to inhibit cSCC angiogenesis and progression in vitro and in vivo studies.

Abstract PO2-05-01: Famitinib, a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with dalpicilib and fulvestrant in advanced HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrinotherapy (ET) represent an essential part of the treatment for HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer (BC). However, the role of angiogenesis inhibitors, such as bevacizumab, in these patients (pts) is controversial. While it has been demonstrated to improve progression-free survival (PFS), it has failed to show a significant overall survival (OS) benefit in HER2-negative BC. Several preclinical studies have explored the combination of anti-angiogenesis multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and CDK4/6 inhibitors in other cancers, suggesting a synergistic effect. Our phase Ib/II trial (NCT05176080, ChiCTR2100053950) aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel anti-angiogenesis TKI famitinib (F) added to dalpiciclib (D) and ET in advanced HR-positive and HER2-negative BC. Here we report the results of Phase Ib. Methods: A 3+3 de-escalation design was used in this dose-exploring phase (phase Ib). Pts with HR-positive and HER2-negative BC, who had no more than two prior chemotherapies in the advanced setting, were enrolled and administered F (orally, at doses of 15 mg/d, 10 mg/d, or 15 mg qod), D (orally, at doses of 150, 125 or 100 mg/d, 21 days on and 7 days off) and fulvestrant (intramuscularly, at a fixed dose of 500 mg every four weeks) until progression, unaccepted toxicities, or withdrawal. The initial dose level (Level 1) was set as F 15 mg daily and D 150 mg/d. The primary endpoints were recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and safety. Results: From December 2021 to June 2022, 18 pts were enrolled, and 3, 6, 3, and 6 pts were assigned to Level 1 (F 15 mg + D 150 mg), Level 2 (F 10 mg + D 125 mg), Level 3 (F 15 mg qod + D 125 mg), and Level 4 (F 10 mg + D 100 mg), respectively. 14 (77.8%) pts had visceral metastasis, and 7 (38.9%) had prior systemic therapies in the advanced setting. 13 (72.2%) pts had received ET, and 11 (61.1%) were resistant to ET before enrolled. A total of 6 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, including 3 Grade 4 thrombopenia (2 in Level 1, 1 in Level 2) and 3 Grade 4 neutropenia (2 in Level 3, 1 in Level 4), 4 of which were serious adverse events (AEs). The most common (≥20%) treatment-related AEs of Grade 3 or above were neutropenia (100.0%), leukopenia (88.9%), thrombocytopenia (33.3%), anemia (27.8%), lymphopenia and hypertension (both 22.2%). No death was reported. Overall 10 pts (55.6%) achieved confirmed partial responses and 16 (88.9%) achieved clinical benefits. Confirmed objective response rates (ORRs), clinical benefit rates (CBRs), and DLTs in different dose levels were shown in Table 1. Considering the efficacy and safety profiles, Level 4 was selected as RP2D. Conclusion: The anti-angiogenesis multi-targeted receptor TKI famitinib combined with CDK4/6i and fulvestrant has shown antitumor effects in advanced HR-positive and HER2-negative BC, and no new safety signals were observed. Citation Format: Min Yan, Mengwei Zhang, Limin Niu, Huimin Lv, Zhenzhen Liu, Huiai Zeng, Shengnan Zhao, Huihui Sun, Jing Wang, Yajing Feng, Huajun Li. Famitinib, a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with dalpicilib and fulvestrant in advanced HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-05-01.

Abstract PO1-17-12: The impact of treatment sequence of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy on Metastatic Breast Cancer treatment outcomes in Real-World practice in U.S

Abstract Background A retrospective study to describe the actual benefit of treatment sequence with Endocrine Therapy (ET) plus cyclin D/cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) therapy including as 1st-line and 2nd -line treatment for Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) and HER2 negative. We examined the extent that treatment sequence of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy is associated with progression-free survival, and overall survival under real-world conditions. Methods This study used the nationwide electronic health record-derived-Flatiron Health de-identified database to estimate the real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS) of MBC patients under different treatment sequence of CDK4/6 inhibitors. A total of 2,771 patients with ≥ 3 months of follow-up received either CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET in the first-line setting (n=2,170) or ET alone in the first-line and CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET in the second-line setting (n=601) between February 3, 2015, and November 02, 2021. We performed inverse probability weighting (IPW) to balance the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between patients in the two groups. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards were used to test for an association of CDK4/6 treatment line sequence on PFS as the primary outcome and OS as the secondary outcome, adjusting for patient characteristics (e.g., age, race, comorbidities, ECOG value, Tumor site, and health insurance). Results Median follow-up was 25.6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 12.7–41.3) for the group with CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET in first-line treatment and 33.1 months (IQR, 18.1–50.4) in those taking ET alone in first-line and CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET in the second-line treatment. CDK4/6 inhibitor combination with ET as the first-line treatment was associated with significantly longer median rwPFS compared to receiving ET alone on first line and CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET in the second line (28.0 vs 13.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% CI, 0.35–0.44; P &amp;lt; 0.0001). Median rwOS was 52 months for the group with first line CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET and 48 months for the other group who received CDK4/6 inhibitor in the second line of treatment. However, the difference was not statistically significant (HR=0.91, 95% CI, 0.78–1.09, P-value=0.33). A propensity scores matching analysis showed similar results. Conclusions In this “real-world” population of patients with HR+/HER2− MBC, receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET as first line of treatment was associated with improved progression free survival compared with patients treated with ET alone in the first-line and CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET on the second line of treatment. Citation Format: Gretchen Kimmick, Asal PIlehvari, Wen You, Gloribel Bonilla, Roger Anderson. The impact of treatment sequence of CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy on Metastatic Breast Cancer treatment outcomes in Real-World practice in U.S [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-17-12.

Abstract PO1-03-07: Revisiting the potential of pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer at the trial-level

Abstract Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) has been used as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant clinical trials for non-metastatic breast cancer and as a surrogate endpoint for long-term survival outcomes. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepted pCR as a surrogate endpoint for the approval of new drugs in the neoadjuvant setting in high-risk early-stage breast cancer. However, though the Collaborative Trials in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer (CTNeoBC) pooled analysis in 2014 showed that at the patient level achieving pCR was associated with longer overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), at the trial-level the association between high pCR rate and better OS and EFS outcomes was weak (coefficient of difference [R2]; 0.03 and 0.24, respectively) among all subtypes of breast cancer. A recent study reported that this association at the trial-level was similarly weak among Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER-2) positive breast cancer (R2; 0.02 and 0.23, respectively). However, the potential surrogacy of pCR rate for OS and EFS in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the neoadjuvant setting has not been well studied in a comprehensive manner. Moreover, because of significant advances in systemic treatment strategies in TNBC over the past decade including a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with conventional cytotoxic agents, the trial-level surrogacy needs to be reassessed in recently published neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC. Our primary objective is to assess the association between pCR rate and survival outcomes in neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC by collecting data from articles published after the CTNeoBC article in 2014. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Articles published between January 1, 2014, and March 31, 2023, were searched. We included only randomized control trials of neoadjuvant treatments for clinical stage I-III TNBC that compared two or more regimens followed by curative intent breast surgery. The selected trials had data for odds ratio (OR) for pCR and hazard ratios (HRs) either for OS or for EFS or disease-free survival (DFS). We excluded trials including estrogen receptor positive, progesterone receptor-positive, or HER-2 positive diseases, and those without data enough to obtain ORs for pCR, HRs for OS, EFS, or DFS. Unpublished data as a full article was also excluded. If EFS could not be obtained from the articles, DFS was used in place of EFS. Two independent investigators (TY and TF) searched and extracted data. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion with the third author (ZZ). A linear regression model on a logarithmic scale weighted by the sample size of each trial was performed and the R2 was used to assess the trial-level association between OR for pCR and HRs for OS or EFS. Results: We identified eight trials with a total of 2,926 patients. Three of the eight trials used ICIs in the intervention arm. One trial did not provide OS data and was not included in the OS analysis. In four trials, EFS was not available and DFS was used for EFS analysis. The R2 was 0.191 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.165 to 0.218) for OS and 0.193 (95% CI, 0.167 to 0.219) for EFS. Conclusions: Similarly to the previous reports, our findings suggest that the surrogacy of the pCR rate for OS and EFS in recent neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC is weak. At this moment, there is no strong evidence to support using pCR as a surrogate for long-term survival outcomes in neoadjuvant clinical trials for TNBC. Citation Format: Toru Yoshino, Zao Zhang, Ryota Sato, Stanley Lipkowitz, Takeo Fujii. Revisiting the potential of pathological complete response as a surrogate for long-term survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer at the trial-level [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-03-07.

Abstract LBO1-02: Pathologic complete response (pCR) of neoadjuvant therapy with or without atezolizumab in HER2-positive, early high-risk and locally advanced breast cancer: APTneo Michelangelo randomized trial

Abstract Background: Neoadjuvant dual targeting of HER2 with trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) plus chemotherapy is the standard of care for high-risk HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC). Compelling data show the contribution of the immune system in prognosis and response/resistance to HER2 directed therapies, supporting combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with anti HER2 antibodies. We designed APTneo to test the role of adding atezolizumab to neoadjuvant dual targeting of HER2 with chemotherapy, and the value of also using anthracyclines in this setting. Methods: In this multicenter open label phase III trial (NCT03595592), 661 patients (pts) with high-risk early and locally advanced (LA) centrally confirmed HER2+ BC were randomized to neoadjuvant HPCT (H and P d1, carboplatin and paclitaxel iv d1 and 8) given q3 wks for 6 cycles w/o (n=223, ARM A) or with atezolizumab 1200 mg iv d1 (n=438, ARM B). In Arm B pts were randomized to Arm B1 (n=218) to receive anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) + atezolizumab iv d1 q3 wks for 3 cycles followed by HPCT + atezolizumab for 3 cycles, or to arm B2 (n=220) to receive HPCT + atezolizumab for 6 cycles. After surgery pts continued adjuvant HER2 directed therapies w/wo atezolizumab until completion of 1 year. Among intent-to-treat (ITT) pts, 44.8% were LABC, 35% hormonal receptor (HR) negative and 30.4% PD-L1 positive. Primary endpoint is event-free survival (EFS) of Arm B vs A. A key secondary endpoint is the rate of pCR (ypT0/Tis, ypN0) w/wo atezolizumab. Primary population for all efficacy endpoints is ITT. We also assessed baseline PD-L1 status (Ventana SP142) and stromal Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTILs). Results: pCR rate in Arm B (57.8%) vs Arm A (52.0%) was not significantly increased (adjHR 1.33, 95% CI 0.95-1.86; p=0.091). Also, the difference in pCR rate in Arm B1 (61.9%) vs Arm B2 (53.6%) was not significant (adjHR 1.402, 95% CI 0.95-2.07; p=0.089). Compared to Arm A, Arm B1 had a 9.9% significantly higher pCR rate (multivariate analysis in Table). The different pCR rate in arms B1 and A was similar regardless of HR and PD-L1 status. High sTILs (≥30%) and PD-L1positive tumors had a higher likelihood of pCR in all arms. Serious adverse events (SAE) after start of therapy occurred in 6.8% pts in Arm A and 14.1% in Arm B (p=0.0064). SAE were numerically more frequent in Arm B1 than Arm B2 (16.7% and 11.6%, respectively), due to hematological toxicity with AC. Immune-related SAE were quite infrequent and similar in B1 (4.7%) and B2 (7.8%), respectively. No grade 5 AE did occur. Conclusions: Addition of atezolizumab to chemotherapy and HP did not significantly increase the rate of pCR in women with HER2+ BC. An exploratory analysis showed that adding atezolizumab to neoadjuvant AC followed by HPCT led to higher pCR rate compared to HPCT and atezolizumab. This could be because of anthracyclines themselves or to drug-drug enhancement of anthracyclines and immune modulation. Atezolizumab did not cause major tolerability issues. Molecular studies of collected biospecimens are ongoing. Patients will continue to be followed up for EFS and overall survival analyses. Table. Supported in part by unrestricted grant from Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd, Switzerland Citation Format: Luca Gianni, Elisabetta Munzone, Mauro Mansutti, Giampaolo Bianchini, Yann Izarzuzaga, Elena Rota Caremoli, Luc Dirix, Lucia Del Mastro, Santiago González-Santiago, Andreas Schneeweiss, Jose Ponce, Chiun-Shen Huang, Pauline Wimberger, Sevilay Altintas, Miguel Martín, Nicoleta Antone, Christian F. Singer, Ugo De Giorgi, Ana Godoy Ortiz, Hans-Joachim Lueck, Riccardo Spezia, Angelica Fasolo, Giuseppe Viale, Pinuccia Valagussa. Pathologic complete response (pCR) of neoadjuvant therapy with or without atezolizumab in HER2-positive, early high-risk and locally advanced breast cancer: APTneo Michelangelo randomized trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr LBO1-02.

Abstract PS09-09: Multiomics profiling and molecular classification refine precision treatment strategies for HER2-positive breast cancer

Abstract Background: Anti-HER2 targeted therapy has achieved a series of breakthroughs. However, the current treatment strategy regarding HER2-positive breast cancer remains indiscriminate and lacks specificity, which limits the further improvement of overall treatment response and may lead to overtreatment and extra cost for some patients. Our study aims to reveal the molecular heterogeneity of HER2-positive breast cancer to guide a more precise treatment. Patients and methods: We selected HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between 2013 and 2014 and conducted genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic profiling. We then applied a non-negative matrix factorization algorithm on transcriptomic data to obtain an unsupervised classification. And we further studied the correlation between subtypes and corresponding treatment strategies in multiple cohorts of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. For clinical accessibility, we developed convolutional neural network models through deep learning algorithm based on digital pathology to identify different subtypes. Additionally, we explored novel treatment strategies using the patient-derived organoids (PDOs) models. Results: We established a novel multiomics cohort of 180 HER2- breast cancer patients and classified them into four clinically significant molecular subtypes: (1) A classical HER2-enriched (HER2-CLA, N=51) subtype characterized by strong ERBB2 signaling and remarkable sensitivity to anti-HER2-targeted therapy (pathologic complete response with dual-targeted therapy: 93%). (2) an immunomodulatory (HER2-IM, N=36) subtype characterized by an immune-activated microenvironment and excellent prognosis with current treatment (no relapse in 97% of patients with a median follow-up of 86 months). Tumors of this subtype were therefore candidates for de-escalatory treatment. (3) A luminal-like (HER2-LUM, N=55) subtype distinguished by activated estrogen receptor signaling and (4) a basal/mesenchymal-like (HER2-BM, N=38) subtype enriched in activated receptor tyrosine kinase pathways. HER2-LUM and HER2- BM showed limited benefit from anti-HER2 therapy, and thus, add-on therapies might be needed. The overall area under the curve (AUC) of the convolutional neural network model based on digital pathology for identifying different subtypes is 0.77. In the exploration of novel treatment strategies, we found in the PDO model that the HER2-LUM subtype is more sensitive to a treatment regimen combining standard (chemotherapy and targeted therapy) with subsequent endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors compared to other subtypes. Additionally, the HER2-BM subtype demonstrated greater sensitivity to treatment with a combination of EGFR inhibitors, PDGFR inhibitors or VEGFR inhibitors. Conclusion: We uncovered a high degree of molecular heterogeneity in HER2-positive breast cancer and illustrated its impact on treatment response. More precise treatment can be given according to the characteristics of different subtypes, which may achieve good efficacy and simultaneously reduce overtreatment and extra cost. The comprehensive profiling of HER2-positive breast cancers could also serve as an important resource for further exploration. Key Words: HER2-positive breast cancer cohort; molecular classification; targeted therapy; precision treatment; de-escalatory treatment. Citation Format: Yu-Wei Li, Ding Ma, Xiang-Rong Wu, Lei-Jie Dai, Shen Zhao, Yu-Zheng Xu, Xi Jin, Xiao Yi, Ying Wang, Cai-Jin Lin, Yi-Fan Zhou, Tong Fu, Wen-Tao Yang, Ming Li, Hong Lv, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Zhi-Ming Shao. Multiomics profiling and molecular classification refine precision treatment strategies for HER2-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS09-09.

Case report: Sintilimab combined with anlotinib as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic bone tumor resection in patients with PSC

BackgroundPulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy with a poor prognosis. PSC is highly malignant and is prone to recurrence even after surgery. The programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor cell proportion score (TPS) 5%, TERT and TP53 gene mutations were detected in this patient accompanied by multiple metastatic sites. The anlotinib is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that could be effective for advanced NSCLC and some sarcoma patients. Limited clinical trials and case reports have shown that PSC patients with gene mutations and PD-L1 expression have good responses to multitarget antiangiogenic drug and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this article, we reported a case with metastatic PSC diagnosed by Computed Tomography (CT)-guided needle biopsy treated with immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic drugs as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). PSC is controlled and the patient achieves successfully limb salvage treatment by surgical resection. Therefore, targeted therapy and immunotherapy can provide sufficient surgical opportunities for limb salvage in the treatment of metastatic PSC patients.Case summaryA 69-year-old male diagnosed with malignant bone tumor in the proximal femur was admitted to our hospital in June 2022 with recurrent fever as well as swelling and pain in the left thigh for twenty days. The initial computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest showed a pulmonary cavity (20 mm × 30 mm) and scattered lung masses. Subsequently, he underwent a CT-guided needle biopsy to distinguish the essence of osteolytic bone destruction and soft tissue mass in the left proximal femur which showed metastatic sarcomatoid carcinoma histology. Genetic testing revealed TERT c.-124C mutation (abundance 8.81%), TP53 p.R342 mutation (abundance 11.35%), tumor mutational burden (TMB) 7.09 muts/Mb, microsatellite stability (MSS), and PD-L1 (SP263) TPS 5% were also detected. The patient was tentatively treated with a combination of antiangiogenic drug and PD-1 inhibitor. After one course, the tumor volume significantly reduced in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathological fracture occurred in the femur after combined treatment. The patient received proximal femoral tumor resection and prosthesis replacement after defervescence. Sequentially sintilimab with anlotinib were administered for over 1 year. Finally, the local tumor was well controlled, and no obvious drug-related adverse reactions were observed. The lesions in the lung remained in partial response (PR) for more than 16 months and complete response (CR) of metastatic tumor in the proximal femur was observed through imaging examinations.ConclusionThis is the first reported case of a metastatic PSC in femur showing a favorable response to the treatment consisting of anlotinib combined with sintilimab. This case suggests that antiangiogenic therapy combined with immunotherapy may benefit patients with metastatic PSC in the preoperative adjuvant therapy for limb salvage.

Abstract PS17-08: A Phase Ib Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Afuresertib Plus Fulvestrant in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer Who Failed Standard of Care Therapies

Abstract Background The combination of an aromatase inhibitor with a CDK4/6 inhibitor is the mainstay of first-line endocrine therapy (ET) for locally advanced or metastatic HR+/HER2− breast cancer (LA/mBC). Management of recurrent disease in the post-CDK4/6 inhibitor setting includes additional lines of ET single agent or in combination with a targeted agent. For patients with HR+/HER2− LA/mBC tumors, fulvestrant monotherapy as the second- or third-line therapy has limited activity with a median PFS of 1.9-3.6 months. Effective targeted treatments for these patients are needed to maintain quality of life, improve survival, and delay the initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods This ongoing single arm, open-label global study (NCT04851613) is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of afuresertib (a pan-AKT inhibitor) plus fulvestrant in patients with HR+/HER2− LA/mBC. Eligible patients must have received 1-2 prior lines of ET. Patients may have prior treatment of CDK4/6 inhibitors (up to 1 therapy), and/or up to 1 line of chemotherapy. Patients received afuresertib (125 mg PO, QD) in combination with fulvestrant (500 mg IM; Day 1 and 15 in Cycle 1, and Day 1 in subsequent 28-day cycles). The safety of the initial treatment doses of the combination therapy was evaluated in the first 6 patients during the Cycle 1 safety run-in period. Radiographic assessment per RECIST 1.1 was performed every 8 weeks for the first 6 cycles and every 12 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability of the combination therapy and pharmacokinetic characterization. Results Twenty patients (1 male and 19 females, 3 in the US and 17 in China) were enrolled between May 2022 and April 2023. As of the data cut-off date of May 26th, 2023, 10 patients had discontinued the study treatment (9 due to disease progression, 1 due to patient’s withdrawal of consent) and 10 patients were still in treatment. Of the 19 patients who had at least one post-baseline tumor assessment, 4 patients observed confirmed Partial Response (cPR), 12 had best overall response of Stable Disease, and 3 had Progressive Disease (PD). The Disease Control Rate is 84%. Of the 15 patients who had at least 2 tumor assessments or who discontinued treatment early due to PD, the confirmed ORR is 26.7% (4 cPR). No dose modification was required during the safety run-in. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, &amp;gt; 20% of patients) of all grades were hyperglycemia (50%), diarrhea (45%), ALT/AST increase (40%), nausea (35%), rash (35%), hypercholesterolemia (35%), and anemia (30%), the majority of which were Grade 1. Grade 3 AEs were reported in 4 patients, including diarrhea (1 patient), WBC increase (1 patient), creatine phosphokinase increase (1 patient), and ALT/AST increase and rash (1 patient). No SAE or TEAE &amp;gt;= Grade 4 were reported. No patient discontinued treatment due to TEAE. Conclusions The preliminary data from the combination therapy of afuresertib plus fulvestrant has shown promising efficacy with a well-tolerated safety profile in patients with HR+/HER2− LA/mBC who progressed on 1-2 prior lines of standard of care therapies. These results support further evaluation of this combination therapy in this patient population in an upcoming phase III study. Citation Format: Binghe Xu, Pin Zhang, Tao Sun, Ying Wang, Zhongsheng Tong, Sneha Phadke, Trevor Feinstein, Pengfei Guo, Jing Qu, Xiaoyu Wang. A Phase Ib Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Afuresertib Plus Fulvestrant in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer Who Failed Standard of Care Therapies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS17-08.

Abstract PO1-16-03: GDP-mannose enhances the efficacy of PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with high HRD scores benefit from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, while those with low HRD scores still lack therapeutic options. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) induction is an effective strategy to broaden the indications of PARP inhibitors. Metabolic reprogramming is a critical feature of TNBC. In this study, we aimed to explore novel metabolic biomarkers for HRD and new strategy for sensitizing PARP inhibitors. Methods: We utilized TNBC metabolomics to systematically evaluate metabolites that were correlated with HRD. A crucial metabolite, GDP-mannose (GDP-M), that impedes homologous recombination repair (HR) and sensitizes PARP inhibitors was identified and functionally validated. We further explored the detailed mechanism and proposed a potential treatment strategy utilizing GDP-M for TNBC in preclinical models. Results: Systematic metabolomic analysis revealed that GDP-mannose (GDP-M) was significantly enriched in basal-like tumors with HRD. GDP-M promoted cisplatin-induced DNA double-strand breaks by inducing HRD. Mechanistically, the low expression of the upstream enzyme GMPPA led to the endogenous upregulation of GDP-M, which further promoted the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of BRCA2 to inhibit HR. GMPPA expression and GDP-M could serve as predictive biomarkers for HRD and the response to PARP inhibitors. Therapeutically, we validated that the combination of GDP-M and PARP inhibitors synergistically inhibit tumor growth in multiple preclinical models. Moreover, GDP-M supplementation plus PARP inhibition activated STING-dependent antitumor immunity and further augmented the efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibodies. Conclusions: GDP-M promotes the degradation of BRCA2 and thus enhances the sensitivity of PARP inhibitors in TNBC. The combination of GDP-M, PARP inhibitors and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy may be a potential treatment strategy for HRD-low TNBC. Citation Format: Yi Xiao, Jiahan Ding, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Zhi-Ming Shao, Genhong Di, Fan Yang, Xiaoqing Song. GDP-mannose enhances the efficacy of PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-16-03.

Abstract PO4-19-09: Comparison of clinical efficacy between letrozole + ribociclib vs. Fulvestrant + letrozole + ribociclib in Hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer – a randomized, phase 2 study (KCSG BR22-20)

Abstract Background The current standard first-line treatment in advanced or metastatic hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer is combination of aromatase inhibitor (AI) and cyclin D kinase-4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor. Emergence of ESR1 mutation is a key mechanism of resistance during first-line AI + CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment. Selective estrogen receptor downregulator (SERD) such as elacestrant or fulvestrant is suggested as second-line treatment, but the progression-free survival (PFS) outcome of second-line treatment is reported up to 3.78 months in patients who harbour ESR1 mutation. Recently, early switch of AI + CDK4/6 inhibitor to fulvestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor at the point of rising ESR1 mutation showed prolongation of PFS up to 6 months, suggesting there may be a new strategy to overcome ESR1 mutation by modifying endocrine treatment. SWOG S0226 suggested that upfront fulvestrant + AI is feasible and associated with prolongation of PFS compared to AI alone. After CDK4/6 inhibitor has been introduced to standard treatment, there were no trials evaluating the role of AI + fulvestrant with CDK4/6 inhibitor. In this trial, we investigated triplet combination of AI + fulvestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor as a treatment to overcome resistant mechanism such as development of ESR1 mutation when compared to current standard treatment of AI + CDK4/6 inhibitor as the first line treatment in HR positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Methods This study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label phase II trial comparing AI plus ribociclib versus AI, fulvestrant plus ribociclib in HR-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer. De novo patients or patients with treatment-free interval (TFI) over 12 months after completion of adjuvant AI can be enrolled. If patients received adjuvant tamoxifen, patients with TFI less than 12 months can be also enrolled for the study. Prior endocrine treatment or cytotoxic chemotherapy at metastatic setting was not allowed. In cases of premenopausal women, gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) is administered every 4 weeks with treatment. A total of 202 patients will be enrolled for 30 months, and 30 months of follow-up is planned after last-patient enrolment. Patients are randomized to 1:1, stratified based on the presence of visceral metastasis and previous administration of adjuvant AI. Study treatment of the control arm consists of letrozole 2.5mg daily with ribociclib 600mg (Day 1-Day 21 daily by month, 1 week off) until progression. In the experimental arm fulvestrant 500mg intramuscular injection is added (Day 1, Day 15, Day 29 and every 4 weeks thereafter) until progression. For exploratory analysis of ESR1 mutations, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is collected at baseline, and then every 3 months thereafter. Primary endpoint is to evaluate the difference of 24-months PFS rate. Secondary endpoint included PFS, overall survival (OS), emergence and frequency of ESR1 mutation, overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR). The analysis is planned after completion of 30 months of follow-up, which provides approximately 90% power to detect superiority 24 months-PFS rate assumed by Kaplan-Meier curve of letrozole + fulvestrant + ribociclib versus letrozole + ribociclib using a log-rank test, assuming a hazard ratio of 0.64 at a two-sided alpha of 0.2. Citation Format: Jieun Lee, Su-Jin Koh, Jung Hye Kwon, Gun Min Kim, Jee Hung Kim, Ho Young Kim, Hee-Jun Kim, Keon-Uk Park, Kyong Hwa Park, Yeon Hee Park, Mi Sun Ahn, Hee Kyung Ahn, Gyeong-Won Lee, Kyoung Eun Lee, Kyung-Hun Lee, Moon Hee Lee, Sung Sook Lee, Jung Lim Lee, Kyung Hae Jung, Joo Young Jung, In Hae Park. Comparison of clinical efficacy between letrozole + ribociclib vs. Fulvestrant + letrozole + ribociclib in Hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer – a randomized, phase 2 study (KCSG BR22-20) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-19-09.

Abstract PO1-13-11: ZNF689 promotes homologous recombination via NBS1 ubiquitination and its loss confers sensitivity to PARP inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) poses significant clinical challenges due to the lack of targeted therapies and poor prognosis. Homologous recombination (HR) deficiency is a defining characteristic of TNBC and renders tumors susceptible to Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, not all TNBC patients respond to PARP inhibitors, highlighting the need to identify novel biomarkers to predict therapeutic response and improve treatment strategies. Methods: In this study, we investigated the role of zinc finger protein 689 (ZNF689) in DNA damage response (DDR) and its impact on PARP inhibitor sensitivity in TNBC. Using a comprehensive set of molecular and cellular techniques, including immunoprecipitation, in vitro and in vivo ubiquitination assays, protein expression analysis, and functional assays using TNBC cell lines, patient-derived organoids (PDOs), patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, and cell line xenograft models, we elucidated the mechanistic role of ZNF689 in HR and PARP inhibitor response. Results: Our findings revealed ZNF689 as a novel player in DDR. ZNF689 is activated by ATM-mediated phosphorylation and recruited to DNA damage sites in an ATM-dependent manner. At the DNA double-strand break sites, ZNF689 collaborates directly with NBS1 to facilitate K63-linked ubiquitination of NBS1 via the E3 ligase SKP2. Furthermore, ZNF689-mediated NBS1 ubiquitination stabilizes the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex and feedbacks activation of ATM, therefore accelerating HR repair. Loss of ZNF689 results in HR deficiency, leading to increased sensitivity of TNBC cells to PARP inhibitors in both in vitro and in vivo models. Additionally, the combination of PARP inhibitors and paclitaxel demonstrated potential for improved efficacy in treating ZNF689-deficient TNBC. In our clinical analysis, we observed a positive correlation between ZNF689 expression and the levels of NBS1 and phosphorylated ATM in TNBC patient samples. Importantly, low ZNF689 expression was associated with a favorable response to PARP inhibitors in TNBC patients. Conclusions: Our study highlights the significant role of ZNF689 in HR and its impact on the response to PARP inhibitors in TNBC. These findings suggest ZNF689 as a promising therapeutic target for enhancing the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in TNBC patients. Working Modle Citation Format: Li-Ping Ge, Zi-Yu Wang, Xi Jin, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Zhi-Ming Shao. ZNF689 promotes homologous recombination via NBS1 ubiquitination and its loss confers sensitivity to PARP inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-13-11.

Abstract PO1-19-04: Dalpiciclib and tucidinostat in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors: A phase Ib trial

Abstract Background: Hormone receptor (HR)-positive/epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer accounts for approximately 70% of all breast cancers and is associated with a better prognosis. Estrogen plays an important role in the growth of HR-positive breast cancer, thus patients with this type of tumor are sensitive to hormone inhibitors. However, a quarter of patients will inevitably relapse. Several large clinical trials have demonstrated that the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy (ET) as first or second-line therapy could improve the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for patients with breast cancer. In China, dalpiciclib (a CDK4/6 inhibitor) in combination with fulvestrant has been approved for patients with recurrent or metastatic HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer who have failed ET. Moreover, the combination of dalpiciclib and aromatase inhibitors (AI) as an initial treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer has also been accepted. However, the standard treatment for patients who have failed CDK4/6 inhibitors has not been established. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors cause alterations in gene expression in many signaling pathways associated with oncogenesis, leading to the arrest of tumor cell growth and differentiation, as well as promoting tumor apoptosis. Tucidinostat (an HDAC inhibitor) plus AI has been approved for the treatment of locally advanced HR-positive/HER2-negative postmenopausal breast cancer patients who have failed ET. Theoretically, synergistic effects may occur when HDAC inhibitors are combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Currently, the clinical data on combination therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors have not been reported. Herein, our study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of dalpiciclib and tucidinostat in patients with late-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer who have failed CDK4/6 inhibitors. Trial Design: The present study is a single-arm, open-label, phase I, dose escalation clinical trial (NCT 05586841). Patients were assigned to four groups to receive either dalpiciclib 125mg/d and tucidinostat 25mg/BIW (group A) or dalpiciclib 125mg/d and tucidinostat 20mg/BIW (group B) or dalpiciclib 100 mg/d and tucidinostat 25mg/BIW (group C) or dalpiciclib 100 mg/d and tucidinostat 20mg/BIW (group D). The Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design was performed to determine dose-escalation and de-escalation to find the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of dalpiciclib plus tucidinostat. Key Eligibility Criteria: The study is enrolling female patients who are older than 18 years, with HR-positive/HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 to 2. Before entering this trial, all patients must have received ≤1 previous line of chemotherapy for recurrent or MBC, and have failed CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. Aims: The BOIN design is employed to explore the optimal dose combination of dalpiciclib and tucidinostat and determine recommended doses for a phase II dose expansion clinical trial, based on prespecified dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Statistical Methods: Safety will be evaluated in the safety set including all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and underwent at least one safety assessment. Efficacy will be assessed in the full analysis set, defined as all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. Present and Planned Accrual: Up to 30 participants were planned to be enrolled in the present study. The first participant was enrolled on 18 January 2023. The recruitment is ongoing. Citation Format: Tao Wang, Jinmei Zhou, Xuexue Wu, Zefei Jiang. Dalpiciclib and tucidinostat in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors: A phase Ib trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-04.

Abstract PO3-06-12: Targeting Fatty Acid Synthase in Brain Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Abstract Introduction: Treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is challenging due to the lack of clearly defined and targetable biomarkers, and treatment options become increasingly limited with TNBC brain metastases (BM). Since the brain microenvironment has relatively low lipid availability, breast cancer cells that colonize the brain increase their reliance on the endogenous biosynthesis of fatty acids. This reveals a potential metabolic vulnerability that can be targeted, and fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibition has been shown to decrease breast cancer cell invasion in preclinical models. Methods: In our study, we utilized the TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231-Luc/GFP, its brain-seeking subclone, MDA-MB-231-BR-GFP, and two novel cell lines generated from patient-derived organoids obtained from serial collection of brain-metastatic TNBC resections from the same patient, denoted PDO-BC25 and PDO-BC25-2. Cell lines were screened with FASN inhibitors as single agents vs. combined with SN-38 (topoisomerase I inhibitor) and synergy was assessed by the Chou-Talalay method. To characterize signaling changes with FASN inhibition and identify any off-target signaling, we used a Nanostring metabolic pathways nCounter panel to perform differential expression analysis on cells treated with the FASN inhibitor, TVB-2640, vs. vehicle control across the four cell lines. This panel detects the expression of 768 metabolism-related genes. We used 4 biological replicates per sample and the Benjamini-Hochberg statistical method to control for the false discovery rate after performing a t-test to calculate P-values. In addition, we performed spheroid outgrowth assays to identify any phenotypic impacts of FASN inhibition on spheroid outgrowth. Results: Combinatory drug screening between FASN inhibitors and SN-38 revealed synergy in MDA-MB-231-BR-GFP, PDO-BC25, and PDO-BC25-2, but not in the parental MDA-MB-231-Luc/GFP. The Nanostring nCounter metabolic pathways panel identified direct target engagement where FASN, SCD, and the transcription factor SREBP1 were significantly upregulated in the cells treated with TVB-2640 compared to vehicle control (P-adjusted &amp;lt; 0.05). Other upregulated genes were related to the pentose phosphate pathway, nucleotide salvage and synthesis, reactive oxygen species response, amino acid synthesis and transport, and autophagy. Genes that were down-regulated are involved in cell cycle progression, deoxynucleotide synthesis, DNA damage repair, fatty acid oxidation, and cytokine and chemokine signaling. Moreover, despite no decrease in cell viability, TVB-2640 alone was able to slow the outgrowth and invasion of Matrigel-embedded spheroids in a spheroid outgrowth assay. Conclusions: In our study, we have shown that the combination of SN-38 and FASN inhibitors is synergistic in the TNBC brain-seeking cell lines, and that FASN inhibition alone causes on-target transcriptome-level changes and a decrease in spheroid invasion. Next, we plan on testing the brain-metastatic potential of these cell lines in the presence and absence of a FASN inhibitor using an organ-on-chip microfluidic device developed by our lab that mimics the blood-brain barrier, to identify if this strategy has a potential role in prevention of brain metastases. Further studies to refine the molecular basis of the mechanism of action of the combination are underway. Citation Format: Habib Serhan, Liwei Bao, Xu Cheng, Matthew Soellner, Sofia Merajver, Aki Morikawa, Nathan Merrill. Targeting Fatty Acid Synthase in Brain Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-06-12.

Abstract PO4-20-04: A Randomized Window of Opportunity Study of Preoperative Letrozole and Simvastatin Versus Letrozole Alone in Stage I-III Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer

Abstract Hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancers are poor responders to immunotherapy. There is a need for innovative approaches to improve immune responses in these tumors. The combination of statins and aromatase inhibitors have demonstrated antiproliferative and immunomodulatory properties. However, this combination has never been studied in the preoperative setting; thus, our ongoing study represents an opportunity to investigate this approach. We designed a randomized two-arm presurgical “window of opportunity” trial to evaluate the effects of letrozole and simvastatin versus letrozole alone 14 days prior to surgery. Tissue and blood will be obtained at baseline and 14 days after completion of therapy at the time of surgery. Inflammatory markers in the blood and multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) in tissue will be assessed. To be eligible for the trial, participants must be postmenopausal women with histologically confirmed stage I-III HR+, HER2- invasive breast cancer with baseline ki-67 ≥10% that have not received prior chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and/or immunotherapy within 3 months prior to trial enrollment. They should also not have received any cholesterol lowering medication within 3 months prior to trial enrollment. The primary objective is to determine if the addition of simvastatin to letrozole compared to letrozole alone will result in a decrease in geometric mean % change in ki-67 from pre-surgical baseline to 14 days following preoperative therapy. Ki-67 is a validated surrogate marker for disease-free survival in HR+, HER2- breast cancer. The main secondary objective is to determine if the addition of simvastatin to letrozole compared to letrozole alone will result in increased immune activation from pre- to post-treatment based on the evaluation of the immune subtype composition in tissue via multiplex immunofluorescence. We aim to enroll 16 patients in each arm to achieve 90% power and detect a minimum difference of 7.5% in ki-67 using a two-sided Mann-Whitney U or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test. After accounting for a possible drop off rate of 20%, the study’s target accrual will be 40 participants. Statistical analyses will be performed using SAS 9.4. the significance level will be set at alpha = 0.1. Descriptive statistics will be applied to tissue and blood biomarkers of interest at 2 designated time points, prior to preoperative therapy and following completion of preoperative therapy. The absolute change or percentage change of those biomarkers will also be calculated and compared between the 2 arms using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. The correlation among biomarkers will be described by Pearson correlation coefficient with 95% confidence interval. The p-value will be adjusted by Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate. All adverse events experienced data will be described by summary statistics and will be assessed according to CTCAE version 5.0. Currently, the study has accrued 2 participants. After completing accrual, we will assess whether the tumor-immune milieu has undergone modulation, resulting in a more immunogenic environment. If an immunogenic effect is demonstrated, this will provide rationale for a future multi-center trial assessing the combination of letrozole, simvastatin, and immunotherapy. Citation Format: Ruth Sacks, Elizabeth Haas, Jade Jones, Manali Bhave, Keerthi Gogineni, Jane Meisel, Demetria Smith-Graziani, Suchi Pakkala, Sarah Friend, Cletus Arciero, Lauren Postlewait, Clara Farley, Cathy Graham, Toncred Styblo, Monica Rizzo, Rhonda Pickett, Nicholas Crasta, Lori Brown, Xiaoxian Li, Sunil Badve, Madhav Dhodapkar, Kevin Kalinsky. A Randomized Window of Opportunity Study of Preoperative Letrozole and Simvastatin Versus Letrozole Alone in Stage I-III Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-20-04.

A Practical Review of Encorafenib and Binimetinib Therapy Management in Patients with BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

According to current guidelines, targeted therapy with a combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors is the preferred first-line treatment for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the open-label, single-arm, phase2 PHAROS trial (NCT03915951), the combination of encorafenib, a potent BRAF inhibitor, and binimetinib, a potent MEK inhibitor, demonstrated durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in this patient population. On the basis of the results of this study, the combination of encorafenib plus binimetinib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on October 11, 2023, for patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC. In this review, we summarize the efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib from the PHAROS study. In addition, we discuss strategies to manage adverse reactions with this combination therapy with the intent of minimizing unnecessary treatment discontinuations in these patients.